|
Abstract
|
Diverse responses to and interpretations of William Shakespeare testify to
the human complexities of a larger-than-life writer whom Coleridge aptly
describes as “myriad-minded Shakespeare.”
In the tradition that he wrote, Shakespeare infused within his works the
spirit of his age and also drew from all available sources to perfection,
thereby giving life to the materials which were already defunct or on the
brink of demise. Therefore, what enriches Shakespeare’s works is the
human quality that he depicts in a vibrant tapestry of drama and the unique
perception of human values that he demonstrates.
With this immeasurable arena in view, the versatility and complexity
of Shakespeare’s mind allow for multifarious readings or misreadings
inasmuch as some readers feel so fascinated that their responses become
utterly subjective. After all, interpretation is largely subjective and rarely
can one encounter an objective criticism, particularly when it comes to
writerly texts such as those of Shakespeare. Hence, it is hardly hyperbolic
to say that no writer in the world has been so bedevilled by interpretive
prejudices as Shakespeare.
Shakespeare’s woes and concerns are all human and can be easily
perceived by any reader regardless of religious, ethnic, or educational
backgrounds. To him, human vices are not only odious but pathetic as
well. Hypocrisy irks him tremendously, and he is sharply aware of its
stings when he says: “God has given you one face, and you make
yourself another” (Hamlet 3.1.). And this is very reminiscent of the deep
impact of the Bible on his mind: “Even so ye also outwardly appear
righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity”
(Mathew 23:28).
The “orotund” title of this volume Fundamental Shakespeare may lay
bare the radically fresh light the contributors shed on Shakespeare. In the
past two decades, times have changed drastically and an urgent need for an
entirely new outlook on Shakespeare is felt more than ever before. Ergo,
t
|