Keywords
|
intellect, active intellect
Aristotle, actual intellect,
efficient cause, tenth
intellect.
|
Abstract
|
One of the influential topics in Islamic philosophy is the issue of "active
intellect". This term has entered Islamic philosophy from Aristotle's
philosophy and some interpreters of Aristotle's works. Islamic philosophers
interpreted this issue in the context of their philosophical system and by
expanding its concept from the field of natural and industrial (artistic)
phenomena to the field of epistemology; they gave it a significant role.
These philosophers have presented two types of arguments to prove the
active intellect. Some of these arguments are formulated based on the
theory of the nine spheres and according to the principle of causality. These
arguments attempt to prove efficient causes for the existence of spheres and
introduce ultimate causes for their rotational movements. Arguments of the
second category also attempt to prove active intellect by relying on
principles such as "every event and contingent needs an efficient cause"
and "lacking a thing, it is not given to it". In this article, these arguments
have been examined and finally, it has been concluded that the arguments
of the first category are vulnerable and invalid due to the invalidity of their
basis (planetary theory); and the arguments of the second category can only
prove non-material and efficient cause or causes, provided that their
premises are true, not the active intellect, i.e., the tenth intellect.
|